Sekit CSF · OT/ICS Security · Policy
RCF-0430Safety alignment
Cybersecurity requirements are formally aligned with operational safety and physical process requirements
Mapping at a glance
RCF-0430Safety alignmentOT/ICS Security · Policy
RCF-0430 maps to 4 controls across the published frameworks. Open in the full graph →
Maps to ISO/IEC 27001:2022
Curated mapping with the reasoning, not just the codes.
A.5.1Policies for information securitysupportsSekit's Safety alignment policy, one of the topic-specific policies A.5.1 expects, states that operational safety takes precedence and defines cybersecurity measures for production systems jointly with those responsible for safety.A.5.31Legal, statutory, regulatory and contractual requirementsrelatedA written statement that operational safety takes precedence over cybersecurity measures for production systems is a sector-specific legal alignment this control's tracking should account for in OT environments.
Maps to NIST CSF 2.0
Curated mapping with the reasoning, not just the codes.
Evidence that proves this control
What an auditor, or Sekit's evidence engine, asks for.
OT/ICS security controls
The controls specific to industrial control systems: how their vulnerabilities and incidents are managed and how they align with the physical safety of processes.
From the Sekit evidence catalog
This topic through the other lenses
All OT/ICS Security controls
Ask Sekura: “What evidence proves RCF-0430?”
Also via MCP, free with account