SekitCrosswalk
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 · derived mapping target

A.5.31Legal, statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements

Identify the legal, regulatory and contractual obligations that apply to your information security, and keep your approach aligned with them as they change.

Mapped from the Sekit CSF

The Sekit controls that cover this requirement, lens by lens.

RCF-0016Regulatory compliance · PolicyequivalentA written register of applicable laws and regulations, with an owner for each obligation, is the same requirement this control asks for directly.RCF-0017Regulatory compliance · ProcesssupportsCarrying out the recurring activities each legal obligation demands, consistently and on schedule, is how the register in this control gets acted on rather than filed and forgotten.RCF-0018Regulatory compliance · TechnicalenablesSystem configuration that satisfies regulatory requirements automatically wherever the platform allows it reduces how much of this control depends on manual process alone.RCF-0355Privacy risk assessments (DPIA) · PolicyrelatedAssessing privacy risk before new processing begins is one specific legal obligation, under data protection law, that this control's broader tracking should capture.RCF-0358Consent & preference mgmt · PolicyrelatedA policy on when consent is required and how it is withdrawn is one concrete legal obligation this control's register needs to include.RCF-0376Compliance calendar · PolicysupportsA centralised schedule of every recurring compliance obligation with a deadline and owner is the operational tool that keeps this control's tracked obligations from being missed.RCF-0377Compliance calendar · ProcesssupportsActively working the compliance calendar, with reminders and reviewed misses, is what keeps legal deadlines from being silently absorbed rather than tracked.RCF-0378Compliance calendar · TechnicalenablesAutomated reminders that fire ahead of each due date and escalate if ignored make the compliance calendar behind this control reliable at scale.RCF-0379Regulatory mapping · PolicyequivalentAn approved register mapping every applicable law and framework to the internal controls that satisfy it is this control's requirement, made explicit and traceable.RCF-0380Regulatory mapping · ProcesssupportsTurning each identified regulatory requirement into a concrete, owned obligation is what makes the mapping behind this control actionable rather than a static list.RCF-0381Regulatory mapping · TechnicalenablesA tool that keeps the requirement-to-control mapping current and shows gaps at a glance is how this control stays accurate as regulations and the business change.RCF-0430Safety alignment · PolicyrelatedA written statement that operational safety takes precedence over cybersecurity measures for production systems is a sector-specific legal alignment this control's tracking should account for in OT environments.

NIST CSF 2.0 counterparts

Reached through the Sekit CSF controls both map to — a mapping, not a formal equivalence.

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 — Annex A counterparts

Evidence that proves this control

What an auditor, or Sekit's evidence engine, asks for.

Regulatory obligations register
The list of laws, regulations and frameworks that apply to the company (e.g. GDPR, sector rules) and how they map to your internal controls.
Compliance calendar
The calendar where the company tracks its regulatory deadlines, audit cycles and recurring compliance obligations.
From the Sekit evidence catalog

In practice

The practical version of this control is a single register listing every law and framework the company must follow, GDPR, sector rules, client contracts, each mapped to who owns it and what evidence proves compliance. Small companies often know their obligations informally but have never written them down, which falls apart the moment a new hire needs to know what applies. A compliance calendar with reminders ahead of deadlines catches the annual filing that would otherwise be missed. Auditors test whether the register is current: does it include a regulation that changed recently, or is everyone still working from the version drafted at incorporation.

Common gaps

The regulatory obligations register was last updated when the company was founded and does not reflect laws that now apply, such as NIS2.
Compliance deadlines are tracked informally by the person who happens to remember, with no calendar or automated reminder system.
The mapping between a legal obligation and the internal control that satisfies it does not exist, so nobody can show how the requirement is met.

Questions your auditor will ask

How do you know which laws and regulations currently apply to the company?
A regulatory obligations register lists every applicable law and framework, reviewed and updated as the business or regulations change.
How are compliance deadlines tracked and who is notified?
A compliance calendar lists every recurring obligation with a deadline and a named owner, with automated reminders ahead of each due date.
Can you show which control satisfies a specific legal requirement?
The regulatory mapping links each identified obligation to the internal control or document that addresses it, visible in one place.

Where regulation demands it

NIS2 1.1 requires a policy on the security of network and information systems that reflects applicable legal obligations.
ENS org.2 requires formal security regulations that translate legal and regulatory requirements into internal rules.

Related controls

Via the shared Sekit CSF topic, not the framework's own index.

Ask Sekura: “What evidence proves A.5.31?”
Also via MCP, free with account