Sekit CSF · Secure Operations · Process
RCF-0407SRE/Resilience practices
Reliability targets and error budgets are consistently tracked and drive decisions about feature work versus stability
Mapping at a glance
RCF-0407SRE/Resilience practicesSecure Operations · Process
RCF-0407 maps to 5 controls across the published frameworks. Open in the full graph →
Maps to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 · Annex A controls
Curated mapping with the reasoning, not just the codes.
A.5.30ICT readiness for business continuitysupportsTracking reliability targets and error budgets so they genuinely steer priorities keeps day-to-day ICT resilience work funded, not only the disaster recovery plan.A.8.6Capacity managementrelatedTracking reliability targets and error budgets continuously, and letting results steer feature versus stability work, is a resilience practice beside capacity planning rather than capacity management on its own.
Maps to NIST CSF 2.0
Curated mapping with the reasoning, not just the codes.
PR.IR-03Resilience mechanisms implementedPR.IR-04Adequate capacity maintainedRC.RP-01Recovery plan executed
Evidence that proves this control
What an auditor, or Sekit's evidence engine, asks for.
Availability and capacity management
How the company ensures its critical services are available as expected, plans their capacity, and prevents problems from recurring.
From the Sekit evidence catalog
This topic through the other lenses
All Secure Operations controls
Ask Sekura: “What evidence proves RCF-0407?”
Connect your AI · free MCP
https://sekit.ai/api/mcp/crosswalk- In Claude or ChatGPT, add a custom connector and paste this URL.
- Sign in with your email to finish. Free, read-only, no organization required.