Sekit CSF · Logging & Monitoring · Policy
RCF-0214Telemetry coverage
The company formally identifies which systems must generate security telemetry and ensures there are no blind spots
Mapping at a glance
RCF-0214Telemetry coverageLogging & Monitoring · Policy
RCF-0214 maps to 6 controls across the published frameworks. +1 more in the table below. Open in the full graph →
Maps to ISO/IEC 27001:2022
Curated mapping with the reasoning, not just the codes.
A.5.1Policies for information securitysupportsSekit's Telemetry coverage policy is a topic-specific policy under A.5.1 that names which systems must produce security telemetry so any visibility gap is a documented decision, not an accident.A.8.15LoggingenablesDefining which systems must produce security telemetry turns visibility gaps into a documented decision, the scoping step A.8.15's logging coverage depends on.
Maps to NIST CSF 2.0
Curated mapping with the reasoning, not just the codes.
DE.CM-01Networks monitoredDE.CM-03Personnel activity monitoredDE.CM-06External provider activity monitored
Maps to ISO/IEC 42001:2023 — Annex A
Curated mapping with the reasoning, not just the codes.
Evidence that proves this control
What an auditor, or Sekit's evidence engine, asks for.
Logging and monitoring configuration
How the company collects and keeps activity logs from its systems, and how security alerts are generated and handled.
From the Sekit evidence catalog
This topic through the other lenses
All Logging & Monitoring controls
Ask Sekura: “What evidence proves RCF-0214?”
Also via MCP, free with account