Sekit CSF · Backup & Recovery · Technical
RCF-0252RTO/RPO definitions
Technical architecture is designed to meet defined recovery time and recovery point objectives
Mapping at a glance
RCF-0252RTO/RPO definitionsBackup & Recovery · Technical
RCF-0252 maps to 4 controls across the published frameworks. Open in the full graph →
Maps to ISO/IEC 27001:2022
Curated mapping with the reasoning, not just the codes.
A.5.30ICT readiness for business continuitysupportsBuilding backup and recovery architecture that demonstrably hits documented RTO and RPO targets covers the technical layer this control needs, but not the continuity plans and capacity management it also requires.A.8.14Redundancy of information processing facilitiessupportsThe RTO/RPO technical facet builds the backup and recovery architecture to demonstrably meet documented recovery targets, the availability leg A.8.14 asks a redundancy design to satisfy.
Maps to NIST CSF 2.0
Curated mapping with the reasoning, not just the codes.
Evidence that proves this control
What an auditor, or Sekit's evidence engine, asks for.
Disaster recovery plan and runbooks
The plan defining how long each critical system can be down (RTO/RPO) and the step-by-step guides to recover it after a serious failure.
From the Sekit evidence catalog
This topic through the other lenses
All Backup & Recovery controls
Ask Sekura: “What evidence proves RCF-0252?”
Also via MCP, free with account