Sekit CSF · Incident Response · Technical
RCF-0279Post-incident review (lessons learned)
Technical tools capture incident data to support post-incident analysis
Mapping at a glance
RCF-0279Post-incident review (lessons learned)Incident Response · Technical
RCF-0279 maps to 5 controls across the published frameworks. Open in the full graph →
Maps to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 · Annex A controls
Curated mapping with the reasoning, not just the codes.
A.5.27Learning from information security incidentsenablesRetaining incident timelines and logs in tooling gives a post-incident review the data it needs to reconstruct what happened accurately.A.8.15LoggingsupportsRetaining incident timelines and response records in tooling depends directly on the activity logs A.8.15 requires, so a review can reconstruct what happened.A.8.16Monitoring activitiesrelatedRetaining incident data for post-incident review analyzes what monitoring already caught, rather than being the detection activity A.8.16 covers.
Maps to NIST CSF 2.0
Curated mapping with the reasoning, not just the codes.
Evidence that proves this control
What an auditor, or Sekit's evidence engine, asks for.
Incident playbooks, exercises and forensics readiness
The step-by-step guides for the most likely incidents, the tabletop exercises, the post-incident review reports, and how evidence is preserved so an incident can be investigated.
From the Sekit evidence catalog
This topic through the other lenses
All Incident Response controls
Ask Sekura: “What evidence proves RCF-0279?”
Connect your AI · free MCP
https://sekit.ai/api/mcp/crosswalk- In Claude or ChatGPT, add a custom connector and paste this URL.
- Sign in with your email to finish. Free, read-only, no organization required.