Sekit CSF · Vulnerability & Configuration · Policy
RCF-0229Patch prioritization
The company formally prioritises patches based on vulnerability severity, asset criticality and exploitation likelihood
Mapping at a glance
RCF-0229Patch prioritizationVulnerability & Configuration · Policy
RCF-0229 maps to 6 controls across the published frameworks. +1 more in the table below. Open in the full graph →
Maps to ISO/IEC 27001:2022
Curated mapping with the reasoning, not just the codes.
A.5.1Policies for information securitysupportsSekit's Patch prioritization policy is a topic-specific policy under A.5.1 that ranks patches by combining flaw severity, asset criticality and whether the flaw is being actively exploited.A.8.8Management of technical vulnerabilitiessupportsThis policy facet defines how patches are ranked by severity, asset criticality and active exploitation, the prioritization logic A.8.8's timely-action requirement depends on.
Maps to NIST CSF 2.0
Curated mapping with the reasoning, not just the codes.
Maps to Cyber Essentials
Curated mapping with the reasoning, not just the codes.
Evidence that proves this control
What an auditor, or Sekit's evidence engine, asks for.
Patch management report
The proof that security updates are applied on time across devices and systems, with tracking of what is still outstanding.
From the Sekit evidence catalog
This topic through the other lenses
All Vulnerability & Configuration controls
Ask Sekura: “What evidence proves RCF-0229?”
Also via MCP, free with account