Sekit CSF · Logging & Monitoring · Policy
RCF-0202Alerting & triage
The company formally defines how security alerts are prioritised, assigned and responded to
Mapping at a glance
RCF-0202Alerting & triageLogging & Monitoring · Policy
RCF-0202 maps to 6 controls across the published frameworks. +1 more in the table below. Open in the full graph →
Maps to ISO/IEC 27001:2022
Curated mapping with the reasoning, not just the codes.
A.5.1Policies for information securitysupportsSekit's Alerting and triage policy, one of A.5.1's topic-specific policies, defines how security alerts are prioritised, assigned, and how quickly each priority level must be looked at.A.5.25Assessment and decision on information security eventssupportsA written policy defining alert priority and assignment supports triage, but deciding whether an event qualifies as an incident is a separate judgment this control requires, not something the policy itself performs.
Maps to NIST CSF 2.0
Curated mapping with the reasoning, not just the codes.
Maps to ISO/IEC 42001:2023 — Annex A
Curated mapping with the reasoning, not just the codes.
Evidence that proves this control
What an auditor, or Sekit's evidence engine, asks for.
Logging and monitoring configuration
How the company collects and keeps activity logs from its systems, and how security alerts are generated and handled.
From the Sekit evidence catalog
This topic through the other lenses
All Logging & Monitoring controls
Ask Sekura: “What evidence proves RCF-0202?”
Also via MCP, free with account