NIST CSF 2.0 · derived mapping target
PR.AA-02Identities proofed and bound
Verify that people are who they claim to be before issuing credentials, with rigor matched to the sensitivity of the access. Weak proofing undermines every control downstream.
Mapping at a glance
PR.AA-02Identities proofed and boundNIST CSF 2.0
RCF-0061Identity lifecycleIdentity & Access Management · PolicyRCF-0062Identity lifecycleIdentity & Access Management · ProcessRCF-0063Identity lifecycleIdentity & Access Management · TechnicalRCF-0064Strong authentication (MFA)Identity & Access Management · PolicyRCF-0065Strong authentication (MFA)Identity & Access Management · Process
PR.AA-02 is covered by 18 Sekit CSF controls. +13 more in the table below. Open in the full graph →
Mapped from the Sekit CSF
The Sekit controls that cover this requirement, lens by lens.
RCF-0061Identity lifecycle · PolicyRCF-0062Identity lifecycle · ProcessRCF-0063Identity lifecycle · TechnicalRCF-0064Strong authentication (MFA) · PolicyRCF-0065Strong authentication (MFA) · ProcessRCF-0066Strong authentication (MFA) · TechnicalRCF-0073SSO & federation · PolicyRCF-0074SSO & federation · ProcessRCF-0075SSO & federation · TechnicalRCF-0076Password policy · PolicyRCF-0077Password policy · ProcessRCF-0078Password policy · TechnicalRCF-0079Session management · PolicyRCF-0080Session management · ProcessRCF-0081Session management · TechnicalRCF-0088JML (joiner-mover-leaver) · PolicyRCF-0089JML (joiner-mover-leaver) · ProcessRCF-0090JML (joiner-mover-leaver) · Technical
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 counterparts
Reached through the Sekit CSF controls both map to — a mapping, not a formal equivalence.
Cyber Essentials counterparts
Evidence that proves this control
What an auditor, or Sekit's evidence engine, asks for.
Joiner-mover-leaver procedure
The process the company follows when someone joins, changes role, or leaves: how access and devices are granted and removed.
From the Sekit evidence catalog
Related controls
Via the shared Sekit CSF topic, not the framework's own index.
Ask Sekura: “What evidence proves PR.AA-02?”
Also via MCP, free with account